March102013
When I was in JC, I remember going through a crisis sometime in March I believe of 2004 where I sat at the void deck in ACJC and having processed all the arguments for historicization and revisionism and post revisionism, I was in an epistemological crisis. I remember going through the S paper question that “history is written by the victors” and thinking that nothing is true if that were a fact of history. 

And I remember sitting down with Charles Ng and telling him about my woes and confusion - how can I know anything is true? Even the gospel of Jesus Christ and the bible which contains it! What if it were all a construction? 

And that was when Charles introduced me to this man, Ravi Zacharias and lifted me out of my crisis. He helped me see that is was possible to be intelligent and still a believer and have a reliable and robust epistemology. 

Since then, between 2004-2007 I must have listened to every sermon on the RZIM website, and stretching out into the Case for Christ and Faith which also contains references to Ravi and others. Studying Willkam Lane Craig, Gary Habermas, Ben Witherington III, Michael Behe, D A Carson and others was food for my mind. But it all began with Ravi. 

So I am thankful for the man who taught me the law of non contradiction and other reasoning tools that I carry to this this day. And i was so pleased that we could sit down and hear him speak for 3 hrs. Cheers.

When I was in JC, I remember going through a crisis sometime in March I believe of 2004 where I sat at the void deck in ACJC and having processed all the arguments for historicization and revisionism and post revisionism, I was in an epistemological crisis. I remember going through the S paper question that “history is written by the victors” and thinking that nothing is true if that were a fact of history.

And I remember sitting down with Charles Ng and telling him about my woes and confusion - how can I know anything is true? Even the gospel of Jesus Christ and the bible which contains it! What if it were all a construction?

And that was when Charles introduced me to this man, Ravi Zacharias and lifted me out of my crisis. He helped me see that is was possible to be intelligent and still a believer and have a reliable and robust epistemology.

Since then, between 2004-2007 I must have listened to every sermon on the RZIM website, and stretching out into the Case for Christ and Faith which also contains references to Ravi and others. Studying Willkam Lane Craig, Gary Habermas, Ben Witherington III, Michael Behe, D A Carson and others was food for my mind. But it all began with Ravi.

So I am thankful for the man who taught me the law of non contradiction and other reasoning tools that I carry to this this day. And i was so pleased that we could sit down and hear him speak for 3 hrs. Cheers.

November182012
November132012

10 things I am grateful for

1. For new life in Jesus Christ where I live for Him and for His glory

2. For all of the beautiful truths and riches in God’s Word that have sustained my wonder and amazement all these years

3. For godly parents and Christian siblings who have loved me and shown me grace and built me up as a person to know and serve The Lord

4. For an education which has cultivated my character, honed my mind and established my faith

5. For an imperfect but healthy body which God has given me to steward

6. For a church which is human, full of sin and disaster, but sovereignly guarded by God’s grace and not abandoned by and to His purposes

7. For a nation in which justice and righteousness is upheld, rule of law is stable and discharged, where governing authorities are true, where man has liberty to practice faith and freedom

8. For a professional occupation in which I pursue God’s calling and I can serve His purposes under secular employment and do meaningful, remunerated work

9. For wealth that God has given me to bless and serve others and enjoy His provision

10. For friends who love and care for me though I and they are both imperfect, and are willing to befriend me as an individual, not a resource or tool but a person

November62012

Harmony is not tolerance

Today at the Conversation meeting at SST, I decided to muster my courage and make a comment about how racial tolerance is not the same as racial harmony. There was a Muslim Malay fellow educator present, but I thought what the heck, since we’re doing a no holds barred discussion, why not? VPs and other middle management staff all around, but oh well, into the pond we wade.

So I explained that in an ideal world, racial and religious tolerance exists when we have differences and yet we persist in maintaining our civic respect and deference to one and another’s rights to belief instead of imposing, ignoring or caricaturing what others think and feel. This results in healthy dialogue, discussion, and cultivation of genuine respect. This kind of ‘tolerance’ then agrees to respect differences after they have been voiced, dialogued over, and mutually understood. 

However, what we practice today is a form of tolerance that is so wary of the individual to discuss and learn from one another, so much so that we passively just sit and endure one another’s existence. Yes, we might compromise pragmatically for mutual convenience, but inside, our attitudes towards these foreign and different groups are anything but positive or respectful. We caricature them, distance from them, and God forbid that we should talk to them, or worse, disagree with them. Consequently, we live in a politically correct age with little real understanding or sharing of common ground.

It woudl be plenty to suggest a move from the current ‘tolerance’ to the other sense of the word tolerance (as per the second paragraph) suggested though going one step further into harmony. How might we learn from one another? Dialogue, question, query and even disagree with one another? Of course, ultimately, our harmony depends on our ability to respectfully and healthily tolerate one another’s different beliefs, but to harmonize means surely more than that. Of course, I do not advocate a blind celebration of differences in a stereotypical fashion, but how might we have different races in true harmonization? 

The answer to that elusive question, is surely, only when we something that makes us sing together to harmonize about - something much bigger than mere national identity. 

September182012
September102012
September82012
September62012
“God’s will is totally sovereign, gloriously redemptive, sometimes puzzling but always perfect!” Edmund Chan, IDMC 2012
September22012
Singapore’s Night Festival 2012

Singapore’s Night Festival 2012

August272012
August212012
August172012
August112012
August92012
Happy 47th Birthday Singapore!

Happy 47th Birthday Singapore!

7AM
Why my colleague drew this I have no idea. But this apparently is what people at TWSS think of me.

Why my colleague drew this I have no idea. But this apparently is what people at TWSS think of me.

← Older entries Page 1 of 13